Frequently asked questions

About the project

What is Save the Sand?

Save the Sand is a 40-year community agroforestry and reforestation project in the Sabie and Sand river catchments, Mpumalanga. Households plant and care for 2.5 million trees on their homesteads and croplands, earning income for keeping them alive. The trees remove carbon, protect the catchment and produce fruit and nuts.

Where is the project, and why this catchment?

The project sits in Bushbuckridge, on the western boundary of the Greater Kruger. The Sabie and Sand rivers feed Kruger National Park and support around 2.3 million people through tourism, farming and services. The area lies within the Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany biodiversity hotspot and the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Reserve, yet faces high unemployment, land degradation and water stress.

Who is behind the project, and who are your partners?

The project is developed by Sand Catchment (Pty) Ltd, the registered project proponent. Partners include SANParks, Global Water Partnership Southern Africa, the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (through the national trees programme), Good Work Foundation, the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Reserve and ten Traditional Authorities. Earthood is the independent validation body.

How big is the project, and over what timeframe?

2.5 million trees across 40,000 hectares, involving up to ~120,000 households in ten Traditional Authority areas. The crediting period runs from 1 January 2026 to 31 December 2066.

Which tree species are you planting, and why fruit trees alongside indigenous species?

The mix is weighted towards indigenous Lowveld species such as marula, knob thorn and apple leaf, with fruit trees such as mango, avocado and pawpaw. Indigenous trees store carbon for centuries and support biodiversity. Fruit trees give households food and income in the early years, which is what keeps trees alive. Households choose species that suit their land.

Carbon integrity

Which standards and methodology is the project certified under?

Verra's Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) using methodology VM0047 (Afforestation, Reforestation and Revegetation, v1.1), with the Climate, Community & Biodiversity (CCB) Standard v3.0, targeting Gold Level for climate and community benefits. Project ID: VCS 5375.

Where is the project in the Verra validation process?

The project entered validation in September 2026, with Earthood as the validation/verification body. Validation is in progress.

How many carbon credits will the project generate, and when?

The project is estimated to generate ~7.6 million verified carbon units (VCUs) over 40 years, after a 10% uncertainty deduction and a 16% contribution to Verra's buffer pool. Volumes are small in the early years while trees establish, rising from the early 2030s. These are ex-ante projections pending validation; actual issuance depends on measured tree survival and growth.

What makes the project additional?

Additionality has been assessed under Verra's requirements using three tests: regulatory surplus (no law requires this planting), investment analysis (it isn't financially viable without carbon revenue) and common practice (household tree planting at this scale doesn't happen in the area). Without the project, households lack the seedlings, training and income needed to plant and protect trees.

How do you measure carbon, and how accurate is it?

Every tree is counted. The project uses a census-based approach: each tree is geo-referenced, tagged with a unique ID and recorded at planting. Growth is measured through field sampling, using species-specific or approved allometric equations, supported by satellite data. A 10% uncertainty deduction is applied to estimates, and every claim is checked by an independent verifier.

How do you prevent leakage, such as displaced grazing or land clearing elsewhere?

Trees are planted on homesteads and croplands alongside existing land use, not in place of it, so households keep farming. Under the census-based approach, VM0047 treats leakage as zero, but the project still monitors fuelwood use, crop production and grazing, and can establish dedicated woodlots if pressure on trees rises.

How do you prevent double counting, including under Article 6?

Each credit is issued once, with a unique serial number, on the Verra registry, and retired when used. For Article 6 use, the project is engaging the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. A corresponding adjustment has not yet been granted, so credits are currently suited to voluntary use.

Who independently verifies the credits?

An accredited Verra validation/verification body. Earthood is validating the project. Verification will follow monitoring periods, with full re-counts or statistical sampling of trees at least every five years.

Tree survival and permanence

What happens if trees die? What mortality rate do you plan for?

Credits are only issued for trees that are alive and measured, so dead trees never generate credits. Custodians report deaths through a mobile app or community liaisons, field teams verify reports, and a full re-count or statistical sample (±10% precision at 95% confidence) is done every five years. Dead trees can be replanted. Household payments are linked to survival milestones, giving every custodian a reason to keep trees alive.

How do you track the survival of individual trees?

Every tree has a unique ID, GPS coordinates and a physical tag, and is linked to a named household custodian who confirms its location. A tree is recorded as dead if it shows no living tissue or can't be found at its coordinates. 10% of field checks are repeated by a second team.

What happens to the carbon if there's a fire, drought or El Niño year?

Risks are managed through drought-tolerant indigenous species, planting timed to rainfall, water-wise establishment, replanting and an adaptive management plan. Trees are spread across thousands of homesteads and croplands rather than one plantation block, so a single event can't wipe out the project. Any losses after issuance are covered by Verra's buffer pool.

How long will the carbon stay locked up, and what protects it after the crediting period?

The project runs for 40 years. Many indigenous species, such as marula, live for centuries, and several are protected by law once planted. Fruit trees have shorter lives. After the crediting period, the trees remain household assets producing food and income, and the skills and value chains built by the project give communities reason to keep them.

What is the buffer pool, and how much is set aside?

The buffer pool is a shared insurance reserve held by Verra across all nature-based projects. The project's non-permanence risk rating is 16%, so 16% of credits (~1.65 million tCO₂e) go into the buffer and aren't sold. If carbon is lost, buffer credits are cancelled to cover it.

Do trees compete with the catchment for water?

Trees are planted at low densities (up to 100 per hectare on croplands, 50 on homesteads) in settled and farmed areas, not as dense plantations, and are mostly drought-tolerant indigenous species. The project is working with water authorities to align with catchment management planning.

Communities

Who are the tree custodians, and how do households join?

Custodians are households and smallholder farmers in the project area who agree to plant and care for trees on their land. Field teams visit door to door to explain the project, obtain consent and register each household. Joining costs the household nothing.

How did communities give consent (FPIC)?

The project follows Free, Prior and Informed Consent. Phase One ran through community assemblies, focus groups and meetings with Traditional Authorities, in local languages, and was documented with signed resolutions and minutes. Phase Two, now under way, confirms carbon consent and finalises benefit-sharing arrangements with each of the ten Traditional Authorities. Communities can withdraw, and a grievance process is in place.

How much of the carbon revenue goes to communities, and how is it paid?

Benefits flow in three tiers: (1) direct payments to tree custodians, modelled at about US$1 per tree per year in the early establishment years (~US$7 million); (2) local jobs and procurement, with ~98% of project spend planned to stay local; (3) a 20% share of net carbon revenue once early financing is repaid. Payments are made by mobile money or bank transfer. Final arrangements are being co-designed with communities in FPIC Phase Two and may change.

Why would households keep trees alive for 40 years?

Three reasons: survival-linked payments in the early years, fruit and nuts as trees mature, and a long-term share of carbon revenue. Marula also links households to a growing oil value chain.

What role do Traditional Authorities play?

Traditional Authorities hold customary governance over the land. They provide consent and legitimacy, help resolve disputes and benefit through a community infrastructure fund. They don't control household payments, which go directly to custodians.

Who owns the land and the carbon rights?

Land remains under customary tenure through the Traditional Authorities, and households keep full use of their land. No one is displaced. Sand Catchment (Pty) Ltd holds the carbon rights through agreements with communities and custodians. Trees and their fruit belong to the household.

Co-benefits

What are the benefits beyond carbon?

Healthier catchments and soils, restored habitat in a biodiversity hotspot, food security from fruit and nut trees, household income, local jobs, and training in agroforestry and nursery work, with a focus on women and youth.

What does CCB Gold mean?

The CCB Standard verifies that a project delivers real benefits for climate, communities and biodiversity, not just carbon. Gold Level recognises exceptional benefits. The project is targeting Gold for climate adaptation and community benefits.

How do you measure social impact beyond counting jobs?

The project tracks how household livelihoods change over time — income, food security, skills and resilience — rather than just counting jobs created. Monitoring is built into the same household ledger that tracks trees.

Buying credits and partnering

How can I buy credits or secure future offtake?

Contact us directly. We work with buyers on forward offtake agreements ahead of issuance.

Do you offer forward contracts or pre-purchase agreements?

Yes. We offer forward offtake structures, including pre-purchase with payment on delivery and agreements with a floor price and shared upside. Terms are agreed case by case.

What vintages will be available, and when?

Credits begin from the 2029 vintage, but volumes are small until trees mature. Material volumes are expected from the early 2030s, with first issuance expected around three years after planting begins.

Can buyers trace their credits to specific trees or households?

Yes. Every tree is geo-referenced and linked to a registered custodian, so credits can be traced to the trees and communities that produced them, with personal data protected.

How does the project fit with South African government programmes?

The project contributes to the national trees programme, SANParks' mega living landscapes work in the Greater Kruger buffer, and national climate and water goals. It operates as a public-private-community partnership linking government, private capital and Traditional Authorities.

Risk and governance

What are the biggest risks to the project, and how are they managed?

Drought and climate, tree mortality, land tenure complexity, community participation over 40 years, and financing the years before first credit revenue. These are managed through drought-tolerant species and adaptive management, survival-linked payments, FPIC and Traditional Authority partnerships, the Verra buffer pool and a staged capital plan. A full non-permanence risk report forms part of validation.

How is the project governed, and how are decisions made?

Sand Catchment (Pty) Ltd is the project proponent, responsible for delivery, finance and compliance with Verra standards. Communities take part in decisions through FPIC and a proposed Benefit Sharing Framework.

How will you report progress to buyers and partners?

Through Verra's public registry, regular monitoring reports, verified issuance reports and updates on this website. Buyers and investors receive more detailed reporting under their agreements.

Didn't find your question? Ask the team directly.

Detailed financial modelling, project documentation, and the full PDD are available under NDA.